PlayFame Drops California From Blocked-State List, 16 to 15
Sweepstakes casino PlayFame rewrote its state-availability help article at 09:00 UTC on September 29, 2026 and took California off the list of states it says it does not operate in. The list now runs to 15 states, down from 16. California appears instead in a single sentence saying promotional contests are no longer offered there, and none of PlayFame's five sister brands has made the same move.
The article is the one a player reads before signing up. It used to be called "Can I play from anywhere?" and is now called "Is PlayFame available in my location?". PlayFame's own Zendesk record stamps the body edit at 2026-09-29T09:00:20Z; until today that stamp read July 13, 2026.
What exactly does the new PlayFame article say?
Two sentences carry the whole change:
Currently, we do not operate in: Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Washington, or West Virginia.
Promotional contests are no longer offered in California, or in connection with a purchase in Tennessee.
Read that plainly and PlayFame is telling a Californian that the site is open to them. What stops in California is the sweepstakes promotion, not access to the site.
What did the list say before today?
We do not hold the previous body text, only its fingerprint and our own published reading of it, which is how we verify a document has changed. On August 9, 2026 we read this same article and reported what it said: 16 excluded states, California among them, and Tennessee not among them. It put PlayFame's reach at "34 US States and the District of Columbia" and counted Tennessee inside that 34. The fingerprint we store for the article did not move between that reading and 09:00 UTC today.
The sequence, in dates:
- July 13, 2026 - the body-edit stamp PlayFame's help centre carried on this article until today.
- August 9, 2026 - we read it: 16 excluded states including California, Tennessee absent, reach given as 34 states and DC.
- August 10, 2026 - the separate signup article gained a parenthetical naming 13 states and demoting California and Tennessee to a purchase carve-out.
- September 29, 2026, 09:00:20 UTC - the rewrite: 15 excluded states, California gone from the list, no reach figure at all.
So the change is one state wide. California came off the block list. Tennessee was never on it, which is the part of this document we have been reporting as an outlier since August.
Do PlayFame's sister brands say the same thing?
None of them. All six brands belong to B-Two Operations, and the other five still run the older wording.
| Brand | States named as unavailable | California | Tennessee | Body last edited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PlayFame | 15 | Removed Sep 29, 2026 | Not named since at least Aug 9 | Sep 29, 2026 |
| McLuck | 17 | Named | Named | Aug 26, 2026 |
| Hello Millions | 17 | Named | Named | Jul 13, 2026 |
| SpinBlitz | 17 | Named | Named | Jul 13, 2026 |
| Mega Bonanza | 18 | Named | Named | Jun 2, 2026 |
| Jackpota | 18 | Named | Named | Jun 2, 2026 |
One other line vanished. PlayFame's old version put its reach at 34 US states and the District of Columbia. The rewrite publishes no number at all. Its sisters still publish one: 33 states and DC at McLuck, Hello Millions and SpinBlitz, 32 at Mega Bonanza and Jackpota.
The carve-out sentence itself is not new to the family. McLuck, Hello Millions, PlayFame and SpinBlitz all put it in a signup-article parenthetical on August 10, and we wrote about that split at the time: the signup article named 13 states and demoted California and Tennessee to the parenthetical, while the availability article kept blocking more.
PlayFame has now closed its own gap, and the arithmetic is exact. Its signup article names those 13 states and adds that the platform would cease operations in Indiana on July 1, 2026 and in Maine on July 15, 2026. Thirteen plus those two is fifteen, and fifteen is the new availability list, state for state.
What does California's law actually prohibit?
AB 831 added Section 337o to the California Penal Code: "It is unlawful for any person or entity to operate, conduct, or offer an online sweepstakes game in this state." A violation is a misdemeanor punishable by "a fine not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) nor more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000)", imprisonment in county jail up to a year, or both.
The definition has four limbs, and the fourth is the one that matters here. A covered game must be available online, utilise "a dual-currency system of payment", simulate gambling, and award "cash or cash equivalents". The bill's own Legislative Counsel's Digest says the provisions "do not make a game that does not award cash prizes or cash equivalents unlawful".
PlayFame's new sentence says promotional contests are off in California, and a Gold-Coins-only product awards no cash prize. On its face the California half of the carve-out is drafted to the statute. Our California page still says what it always has, and no sign-up links appear there.
Does the Tennessee carve-out match the Tennessee statute?
Tennessee is the half of that sentence that did not change today, and it is the half that reads oddly against the law.
Public Chapter 1117, the enrolled SB 2136, defines an "online sweepstakes game" at Section 47-18-5901(5)(B)(i) as one played with a currency "that is directly purchased, received through a bonus or promotion, or received for free with the purchase of another type of currency or related product, service, or activity".
Nothing in that definition turns on whether the player paid. Currency "received through a bonus or promotion" is inside it, with no purchase attached. Tennessee then makes it unlawful to offer "wagers or entry fees for gambling to a person located within this state" and treats a violation as an unfair or deceptive act under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977. The Senate passed the bill on April 23, 2026, Governor Bill Lee approved it, and Section 11 makes the act effective "upon becoming a law".
So a carve-out that removes only the purchase-linked route addresses a condition the Tennessee text does not ask about. That is a reading of the statute we quote above, not a finding about PlayFame's conduct. We could not check PlayFame's own Terms of Service against it because playfame.com returns HTTP 403 to us.
What should a player in California or Tennessee do about this?
Nothing has changed about the law in either state, and the law is what governs. Both remain statutory ban states on our state-by-state legality matrix, and our Tennessee page carries no sign-up links either.
The practical point is narrower and worth knowing. If PlayFame lets you register from either state, the plain reading of its own document is that you can buy Gold Coins but cannot get sweepstakes entries attached to that purchase. That is a play-money account with no redemption path on the purchased side, which is a very different product from the one advertised on our main ranking. If you are unclear which currency does what, the Gold Coins versus Sweeps Coins split is the thing to read first.
That matters more this week than it usually would. Two minutes before the availability rewrite, PlayFame published a Jackpots feature that charges 0.5% of your Gold Coin balance or 100 GC per eligible round, automatically and with no opt-out in the documents. A player left on the Gold Coin side of the carve-out pays that charge on a currency that cannot be redeemed.
One correction is owed on our own file. Our PlayFame data lists 17 excluded states including California and Tennessee, and both stay excluded: two legislatures have criminalised the conduct, and an operator's help article does not override a statute. But the note attached to that list credits the 17 to "PlayFame's own help centre", and today's rewrite exposes that as wrong. PlayFame's help centre named 16 and left Tennessee out. The 17th state was our own correction, not the operator's list, and the note needs to say so.
Sources & documents
- PlayFame help centre, "Is PlayFame available in my location?", article 15640723009309, body edited 2026-09-29T09:00:20Z
- PlayFame help centre, "How do I sign up to PlayFame.com?", for the 13-state list and the August 10 parenthetical
- McLuck help centre, "Can I play from anywhere?" and the matching articles at Hello Millions, SpinBlitz, Mega Bonanza and Jackpota
- California AB 831, Chapter 623, adding Penal Code Section 337o
- Tennessee Public Chapter 1117 (SB 2136), adding Sections 47-18-5901 to 47-18-5904
21+ only. If gambling stops being fun, call 1-800-GAMBLER or read our responsible gaming page.
How we rate the brands involved
Sources & documents
- support.playfame.com/api/v2/help_center/en-us/articles/15640723009309.json
- support.playfame.com/api/v2/help_center/en-us/articles/15639552637085.json
- support.playfame.com/api/v2/help_center/en-us/articles.json?per_page=100
- support.mcluck.com/api/v2/help_center/en-us/articles/8837446177693.json
- support.hellomillions.com/api/v2/help_center/en-us/articles/14650818054813.json
- support.spinblitz.com/api/v2/help_center/en-us/articles/11703490107805.json
- support.megabonanza.com/api/v2/help_center/en-us/articles/32447149424793.json
- support.jackpota.com/api/v2/help_center/en-us/articles/12669536923548.json
- leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB831
- publications.tnsosfiles.com/acts/114/pub/pc1117.pdf
Every factual claim in this article maps to one of the sources above - that is the publishing bar, not a goal.
FAQ
Is PlayFame now available in California?
Its help article no longer lists California among the states where it does not operate, and says promotional contests are no longer offered there. California's Penal Code Section 337o still makes operating or offering an online sweepstakes game in the state a misdemeanor.
Has PlayFame ever blocked Tennessee in this article?
Not in any version we have read. We read the article on August 9, 2026 and it named 16 excluded states without Tennessee, counting the state among 34 where PlayFame said it was available. Today's version keeps Tennessee off the block list and adds only the purchase carve-out.
Did the other B-Two brands change too?
No. McLuck, Hello Millions, SpinBlitz, Mega Bonanza and Jackpota all still name California and Tennessee in their availability articles, with body edits dating from June, July and August 2026.
Free SC drops, new casinos, and law changes - for your state.
One email a week. No spam, unsubscribe anytime. If your state bans sweeps, you get law updates instead of offers - that's the point.